Study programme 2021-2022Français
Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies
Programme component of Master's in Psychology à la Faculty of Psychology and Education

CodeTypeHead of UE Department’s
contact details
Teacher(s)
UP-M1-MPSYCH-056-MCompulsory UEDENIS JenniferP351 - Psychologie clinique systémique et psychodynamique
  • DENIS Jennifer
  • PICCALUGA Myriam

Language
of instruction
Language
of assessment
HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) CreditsWeighting Term
  • Français
Français201000055.001st term

AA CodeTeaching Activity (AA) HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) Term Weighting
P-SPCE-229Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies : Théorie100000Q1
P-SPCE-230Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies : Séminaire010000Q1
P-SMSL-241Communication, langage et psychologie clinique100000Q1

Overall mark : the assessments of each AA result in an overall mark for the UE.
Programme component

Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes

  • Analyse a situation (individually or collectively) in reference to theories and methodological approaches within psychology.
    • Master and appropriately mobilise knowledge and methodological approaches to understand and explain the normal/atypical/pathological functioning of individuals, groups or organisations.
    • Analyse and model a situation (individually or collectively) by critically selecting theories and methodological approaches.
  • Justifiably choose an intervention and implement and evaluate it.
    • Master knowledge on interventions to improve a given situation (individually or collectively), as well as implement them.
    • Critically analyse the extent and limitations of different types of intervention.
    • Develop a plan of intervention or management in a rigorous and justified manner, taking into account all relevant factors (including underlying issues and associated risks).
    • Implement intervention with reference to theoretical models of intervention, taking into account the constraints and resources in the situation encountered.
    • Appropriately apply different types of intervention.
    • Evaluate the intervention.
    • Alter the intervention.
  • Communicate and exchange information in a structured and adapted way to the intended purpose and relevant public.
    • Present and structure data in a clear, precise, neutral, and non-oriented way.
    • Present the results of a diagnostic evaluation (orally and in writing) and inform various representatives.
    • Write a report arguing over an intervention (including evaluation).
    • Appropriately use presentation materials.
  • Work effectively with different actors as part of a team or a network of professionals.
    • Implement the most effective ways of collaboration in a given situation.
    • Share knowledge and data to carry out a common project.
    • Listen to team members and partners. Encourage expressing a shared opinion. Accept and discuss a different point of view than theirs.
    • Identify professional networks, interact and collaborate with them, and research external expertise if necessary.
  • Act ethically and professionally.
    • Refer to ethical principles to define the framework of their professional practice.
    • Act in compliance with specific legislative frameworks and the code of conduct of Belgian psychologists.
    • Adopt professional attitudes (think critically, avoid prejudices, respect professional confidentiality, etc.).
    • If necessary, appeal to peers or other professionals of other disciplines or expertise.
  • Assess and pursue professional and personal development.
    • Monitor knowledge and methodological approaches in order to evolve their thinking and practice.
    • Learn from practice (based particularly on assessment). Question themselves.
    • Analyse their personal functioning and adapt their professional attitudes. Effectively manage their emotions.
    • Continue to train and improve their skills.
  • Master scientific research methods in psychology.
    • Collect data and analyse it qualitatively and quantitatively.

Learning Outcomes of UE

NA

Content of UE

Na

Prior Experience

Not applicable

Type of Assessment for UE in Q1

  • Written examination
  • Practical test
  • Graded tests

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q1 UE assessment

NA

Q1 UE Assessment Comments

NA

Type of Assessment for UE in Q3

  • Written examination
  • Practical Test
  • Graded tests

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q3 UE assessment

NA

Q3 UE Assessment Comments

NA

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q1 UE resit assessment

NA

Type of Resit Assessment for UE in Q1 (BAB1)

  • Written examination
  • Practical test
  • Graded tests

Q1 UE Resit Assessment Comments (BAB1)

Na

Type of Teaching Activity/Activities

AAType of Teaching Activity/Activities
P-SPCE-229
  • Cours magistraux
P-SPCE-230
  • Séminaires
P-SMSL-241
  • Cours magistraux

Mode of delivery

AAMode of delivery
P-SPCE-229
  • Mixed
P-SPCE-230
  • Face to face
  • Mixed
P-SMSL-241
  • Mixed

Required Reading

AA
P-SPCE-229
P-SPCE-230
P-SMSL-241

Required Learning Resources/Tools

AARequired Learning Resources/Tools
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230videos
Articles
P-SMSL-241Moodle 

Recommended Reading

AA
P-SPCE-229
P-SPCE-230
P-SMSL-241

Recommended Learning Resources/Tools

AARecommended Learning Resources/Tools
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230Not applicable
P-SMSL-241Not applicable

Other Recommended Reading

AAOther Recommended Reading
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230Not applicable
P-SMSL-241Fast LA, Funder DC. Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):334-46. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334.
Mairesse, F. ,Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R. and Moore R.K.( 2007). Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 30,(1),457-500.
Pennebaker, J., King, L. (1999). Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of personality and social psychology,  77, 1296-1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
Pennebaker, J. W. ,Mehl, M. R., Niederhoffer, K. G.  (2003). Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves, Annual Review of Psychology,54,1, 547-577.  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
Yarkoni T. (2010). Personality in 100,000 Words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of research in personality44(3), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001
(*) HT : Hours of theory - HTPE : Hours of in-class exercices - HTPS : hours of practical work - HD : HMiscellaneous time - HR : Hours of remedial classes. - Per. (Period), Y=Year, Q1=1st term et Q2=2nd term
Date de dernière mise à jour de la fiche ECTS par l'enseignant : 14/09/2021
Date de dernière génération automatique de la page : 06/05/2022
20, place du Parc, B7000 Mons - Belgique
Tél: +32 (0)65 373111
Courriel: info.mons@umons.ac.be