Study programme 2018-2019Français
Méthodologie de la philosophie et pratique de l'argumentation
Programme component of Certificate in Didactique à la Faculty of Psychology and Education
CodeTypeHead of UE Department’s
contact details
Teacher(s)
UP-C1-PHICIT-004-MCompulsory UESTAQUET AnneS808 - Philosophie et Histoire des Sciences
  • STAQUET Anne

Language
of instruction
Language
of assessment
HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) CreditsWeighting Term
  • Français
Français30000055.001st term

AA CodeTeaching Activity (AA) HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) Term Weighting
P-CERT-064Méthodologie de la philosophie et pratique de l'argumentation300000Q1100.00%
Programme component

Learning Outcomes of UE

At the end of this course, the students will be able to reflect, in an informed and rigorous philosophical way, on the specific methodology of philosophy and argumentation. This implies that they will be able to:

- recognise the different forms of discourse and identify the modes of argumentation and valid evidence for each of these forms;
- develop modes of argumentation appropriate to the different types of public encountered and the issues addressed;
- identify, and respond appropriately, to the main arguments in oral and written discourses;
- understand the specificity of the critical philosophical approach and its teaching.

Content of UE

In order to develop the ability to debate, reason and argue, all of which are at the core of the specific methodology of philosophy, the course will consist of a more practical than theoretical approach, and will be based on a number of exercises.
We will first learn to identify the specificity of philosophical discourse in relation to other methods of knowledge and reflection on the world. The following sessions will alternate between lectures and group or individual exercises. These will address different points.
In a first phase, we will discuss the different practices of argumentation and debate, then, in a second stage, the question of different types of discourse, proof, demonstrations and arguments, and finally, the use of jargon and political-speak. The many exercises offered to participants will enable them to both recognize these different types of discourse and use them adequately.
The course will conclude with a study of the main errors of reasoning and argumentation in order to allow participants to identify and respond effectively.

Prior Experience

Not applicable

Type of Assessment for UE in Q1

  • Oral examination
  • Quoted exercices

Q1 UE Assessment Comments

The examination will include a written preparation, followed by an oral presentation. It will consist of exercises on the analysis of written or oral discourse in terms of language types, types of discourse and the practice of argumentation.

Type of Assessment for UE in Q3

  • Oral examination
  • Quoted exercices

Q3 UE Assessment Comments

The examination will include a written preparation, followed by an oral presentation. It will consist of exercises on the analysis of written or oral discourse in terms of language types, types of discourse and the practice of argumentation.

Type of Resit Assessment for UE in Q1 (BAB1)

  • N/A

Q1 UE Resit Assessment Comments (BAB1)

Not applicable

Type of Teaching Activity/Activities

AAType of Teaching Activity/Activities
P-CERT-064
  • Cours magistraux

Mode of delivery

AAMode of delivery
P-CERT-064
  • Face to face

Required Reading

AA
P-CERT-064

Required Learning Resources/Tools

AARequired Learning Resources/Tools
P-CERT-064Not applicable

Recommended Reading

AA
P-CERT-064

Recommended Learning Resources/Tools

AARecommended Learning Resources/Tools
P-CERT-064The course will be based on videos (presentations of errors of reasoning and speech to be analyzed) and on the following books: Baillargeon, Norman, Manuel d’auto-défense intellectuelle, Québec, Lux, 2006. Beauvois Jean-Léon et Joule, Robert-Vincent, Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens, Grenoble, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 2014 éd. Augmentée. Bouquiaux Laurence et Bruno Leclercq, Logique formelle et argumentation, Louvain-la-Neuve, 2017³. Durand, Pascal (éd.), Les nouveaux mots du pouvoir. Abécédaire critique, Bruxelles, Aden, 2017. Schopenhauer, Arthur, L’art d’avoir toujours raison [1831] Jamie Whyte, Crimes contre la logique. Comment ne pas être dupe des beaux-parleurs, trad. C. Rimoldy, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2005. Videos and texts will be posted on the moodle platform.

Other Recommended Reading

AAOther Recommended Reading
P-CERT-064Not applicable

Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next

AAGrade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
P-CERT-064Authorized
(*) HT : Hours of theory - HTPE : Hours of in-class exercices - HTPS : hours of practical work - HD : HMiscellaneous time - HR : Hours of remedial classes. - Per. (Period), Y=Year, Q1=1st term et Q2=2nd term
Date de génération : 02/05/2019
20, place du Parc, B7000 Mons - Belgique
Tél: +32 (0)65 373111
Courriel: info.mons@umons.ac.be