Study programme 2022-2023Français
Vision pédagogique et pilotage des établissements scolaires
Programme component of Master's in Education : Specialist Focus on Teaching and Learning in Formal Education (CHARLEROI) (shift schedule) à la Faculty of Psychology and Education

CodeTypeHead of UE Department’s
contact details
Teacher(s)
UP-M1-MEDUEN-018-CCompulsory UEDEMEUSE MarcP316 - Sciences de l'enseignement et de la formation
  • DEMEUSE Marc

Language
of instruction
Language
of assessment
HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) CreditsWeighting Term
  • Français
Français30900066.002nd term

AA CodeTeaching Activity (AA) HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) Term Weighting
P-SEEF-100Pilotage des établissements scolaires156000Q250.00%
P-SEEF-232Vision pédagogique153000Q250.00%

Programme component

Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes

  • Analyse a situation of teaching and learning in reference to theories and methodological approaches resulting from developments in educational sciences.
    • Master and appropriately mobilise knowledge, models, methods and techniques used in various fields of educational sciences in order to understand a teaching-learning situation.
    • Analyse and model an educational action by critically selecting theories and methodological approaches, and taking into account multidisciplinary aspects.
  • Develop and support a teaching-learning device, and implement and evaluate it.
    • Master knowledge about different teaching-learning devices as well as implement them.
    • Critically analyse the extent and limitations of different teaching-learning devices.
    • Rate a teaching-learning device.
    • Alter a teaching-learning device.
  • Communicate and exchange information in the specific field of teaching and academic learning in a structured and adapted way to the intended purpose and relevant public.
    • Present and structure data in a clear, precise, neutral, and non-oriented way.
    • Present (orally and in writing) a personal and adapted summary to the public concerned (to colleagues, non-specialists, sponsors or hierarchy), resulting from their own productions or not.
    • Appropriately use presentation materials.
  • Work effectively with different actors as part of a team or a network of professionals in the specific field of teaching and academic learning.
    • Contribute to the coordination and animation of a multi-professional and multi-disciplinary team.
    • Implement the most effective ways of collaboration in a given situation.
    • Share knowledge and data to carry out a common project.
    • Listen to team members and partners. Encourage expressing a shared opinion. Accept and discuss a different point of view than theirs.
    • Identify professional networks, interact and collaborate with them, and research external expertise if necessary.
  • Act ethically and professionally in the specific field of teaching and academic learning.
    • Refer to ethical principles to define the framework of their professional practice.
    • Act in compliance with specific legislative frameworks athe specific provisions of the context (code of ethics, educational projects, etc.).
    • Adopt professional attitudes (think critically, avoid prejudices, respect professional confidentiality, etc.).
  • Assess and pursue professional and personal development in the specific field of teaching and academic learning.
    • Adopt a reflexive stance in relation to their skills and practice and regulate their actions.
    • Monitor knowledge and methodological approaches in order to evolve their thinking and practice.
    • Continue to train and improve their skills.

Learning Outcomes of UE

Cette unité d'enseignement s'inscrit dans le cadre du plan de formation du " volet inter-réseaux ", arrêté par le Gouvernement le 22 mai 2019 déterminant les objectifs et objets de la formation ainsi que les responsabilités et compétences comportementales et techniques visées du profil de fonction type.

Cette unité d'enseignement vise à développer les capacités couvertes par les deux modules repris sous le titre "vision pédagogique et pilotage" de la formation des directeurs. La première AA couvre spécifiquement la partie "pilotage" et la seconde, la partie "vision pédagogique" du référentiel.
La première AA porte donc spécifiquement sur:
-        la compréhension du sens et de la portée de la notion de pilotage du système scolaire, d'un établissement et du processus de contractualisation du plan de pilotage/contrat d'objectifs ;
-        la contextualisation du leadership partagé et de la dynamique participative dans le cadre du plan de pilotage ;
-        l'initiation aux démarches d'observation objective et d'analyse des forces et des faiblesses d'un établissement scolaire en termes de d'équité, d'efficacité et d'efficience (via notamment les indicateurs utilisés dans l'application Pilotage), de suivi régulier (veille) et de mise en place de régulations et d'évaluation de la réalisation du contrat d'objectifs.
La seconde AA porte spécifiquement sur:
- l'appréhension du système éducatif dans une perspective systémique, en vue du pilotage pédagogique à exercer
- l'identification et la compréhension des enjeux pédagogiques et éducatifs majeurs du système éducatif dans une perspective évolutive, les valeurs qui le sous-tendent
- l'appropriation des orientations pédagogiques contenues dans les bases légales
- l'appropriation des différents concepts et des connaissances de base (à partir des recherches scientifiques) en lien avec les différents objets précisés.

UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance

Cf. Specific Learning outcomes (including common reference, mid-career training, external evaluations, pilot a school ...)

Prior Experience

Compétences développées dans l'UE relative à l'axe administratif, matériel et financier de la fonction de direction.

Type of Teaching Activity/Activities

AAType of Teaching Activity/Activities
P-SEEF-100
  • Cours magistraux
  • Conférences
  • Exercices dirigés
  • Utilisation de logiciels
  • Démonstrations
P-SEEF-232

Mode of delivery

AAMode of delivery
P-SEEF-100
  • Hybrid
P-SEEF-232
  • Hybrid

Required Learning Resources/Tools

AARequired Learning Resources/Tools
P-SEEF-100See Moodle
P-SEEF-232See Moodle

Recommended Learning Resources/Tools

AARecommended Learning Resources/Tools
P-SEEF-100Not applicable
P-SEEF-232Not applicable

Other Recommended Reading

AAOther Recommended Reading
P-SEEF-100Not applicable
P-SEEF-232Not applicable

Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next

AAGrade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
P-SEEF-100Authorized
P-SEEF-232Authorized

Term 2 Assessment - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment
P-SEEF-100
  • Written examination - Face-to-face
P-SEEF-232
  • Written examination - Face-to-face

Term 2 Assessment - comments

AATerm 2 Assessment - comments
P-SEEF-100The evaluation consists of the analysis of two case studies treated individually and in writing by the student (answer sheets are given, answers must be carried hand written on these sheets only).

The candidate may have the record made during the course (legal resources, index, personal notes ...) and all the documents he considers relevant, in paper or electronic (the candidate must be aware that he will not have to an Internet connection, or to the electric network - it will have, if any, have sufficient batteries). The written test is only a maximum of 4 (four) consecutive hours, no break is scheduled between the two case studies provided simultaneously from the start of the session.

Any communication or attempt to communicate with another participant or others outside by any means results in immediate cancellation of the event (mobile phones must be cut during the test).

The student must demonstrate an ability to:
- Analyze a complex situation (situation analysis, case decomposition, coordination of the various problems identified, identification of actors ...)
- Mobilize knowledge related to problem situations (educational point of view, organizational and legal aspects, internal and external resources ...) and articulate;
- Propose realistic and appropriate solutions, taking particular account of the legislation and their scientific basis (research, experiments ... addressed at the training);
- Communicate his thoughts, his pedagogical and organizational strategies;
- Take into account different points of view, aspects of the same problem.
P-SEEF-232The evaluation consists of the analysis of two case studies treated individually and in writing by the student (answer sheets are given, answers must be carried hand written on these sheets only).

The candidate may have the record made during the course (legal resources, index, personal notes ...) and all the documents he considers relevant, in paper or electronic (the candidate must be aware that he will not have to an Internet connection, or to the electric network - it will have, if any, have sufficient batteries). The written test is only a maximum of 4 (four) consecutive hours, no break is scheduled between the two case studies provided simultaneously from the start of the session.

Any communication or attempt to communicate with another participant or others outside by any means results in immediate cancellation of the event (mobile phones must be cut during the test).

The student must demonstrate an ability to:
- Analyze a complex situation (situation analysis, case decomposition, coordination of the various problems identified, identification of actors ...)
- Mobilize knowledge related to problem situations (educational point of view, organizational and legal aspects, internal and external resources ...) and articulate;
- Propose realistic and appropriate solutions, taking particular account of the legislation and their scientific basis (research, experiments ... addressed at the training);
- Communicate his thoughts, his pedagogical and organizational strategies;
- Take into account different points of view, aspects of the same problem.

Term 3 Assessment - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment
P-SEEF-100
  • Written examination - Face-to-face
P-SEEF-232
  • Written examination - Face-to-face

Term 3 Assessment - comments

AATerm 3 Assessment - comments
P-SEEF-100The evaluation consists of the analysis of two case studies treated individually and in writing by the student (answer sheets are given, answers must be carried hand written on these sheets only).

The candidate may have the record made during the course (legal resources, index, personal notes ...) and all the documents he considers relevant, in paper or electronic (the candidate must be aware that he will not have to an Internet connection, or to the electric network - it will have, if any, have sufficient batteries). The written test is only a maximum of 4 (four) consecutive hours, no break is scheduled between the two case studies provided simultaneously from the start of the session.

Any communication or attempt to communicate with another participant or others outside by any means results in immediate cancellation of the event (mobile phones must be cut during the test).

The student must demonstrate an ability to:
- Analyze a complex situation (situation analysis, case decomposition, coordination of the various problems identified, identification of actors ...)
- Mobilize knowledge related to problem situations (educational point of view, organizational and legal aspects, internal and external resources ...) and articulate;
- Propose realistic and appropriate solutions, taking particular account of the legislation and their scientific basis (research, experiments ... addressed at the training);
- Communicate his thoughts, his pedagogical and organizational strategies;
- Take into account different points of view, aspects of the same problem.
P-SEEF-232The evaluation consists of the analysis of two case studies treated individually and in writing by the student (answer sheets are given, answers must be carried hand written on these sheets only).

The candidate may have the record made during the course (legal resources, index, personal notes ...) and all the documents he considers relevant, in paper or electronic (the candidate must be aware that he will not have to an Internet connection, or to the electric network - it will have, if any, have sufficient batteries). The written test is only a maximum of 4 (four) consecutive hours, no break is scheduled between the two case studies provided simultaneously from the start of the session.

Any communication or attempt to communicate with another participant or others outside by any means results in immediate cancellation of the event (mobile phones must be cut during the test).

The student must demonstrate an ability to:
- Analyze a complex situation (situation analysis, case decomposition, coordination of the various problems identified, identification of actors ...)
- Mobilize knowledge related to problem situations (educational point of view, organizational and legal aspects, internal and external resources ...) and articulate;
- Propose realistic and appropriate solutions, taking particular account of the legislation and their scientific basis (research, experiments ... addressed at the training);
- Communicate his thoughts, his pedagogical and organizational strategies;
- Take into account different points of view, aspects of the same problem.
(*) HT : Hours of theory - HTPE : Hours of in-class exercices - HTPS : hours of practical work - HD : HMiscellaneous time - HR : Hours of remedial classes. - Per. (Period), Y=Year, Q1=1st term et Q2=2nd term
Date de dernière mise à jour de la fiche ECTS par l'enseignant : 17/05/2022
Date de dernière génération automatique de la page : 20/06/2023
20, place du Parc, B7000 Mons - Belgique
Tél: +32 (0)65 373111
Courriel: info.mons@umons.ac.be