 | Study programme 2020-2021 | Français | |
| Professional Conduct in Psychology | |||
Learning Activity |
| Code | Lecturer(s) | Associate Lecturer(s) | Subsitute Lecturer(s) et other(s) | Establishment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-SPCE-220 |
|
|
| Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | Français | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Q1 |
| Organisational online arrangements for the end of Q3 2020-2021 assessments (Covid-19) |
|---|
|
| Description of the modifications to the Q3 2020-2021 assessment procedures (Covid-19) |
| Students will be invited to complete a group work (group of 2 to 3 students). To do so, they will have to select a case resulting from a request for an opinion from the commission or relating to a decision of the disciplinary council, among the proposed situations. They will then have to analyze it with regard to the Code of Ethics/deontology, lectures, recommended readings, thematic files of the Commission of Psychologists and personal scientific readings. In concrete terms, students will have to - Indicate to which ethical/deontology aspect(s) the situation refers and justify their choices. - Identify a possible fault, infringement or breach of the code of ethics/deontology (or not) and justify their position - Put oneself in the position of the applicant (in the case of a request for advice) or the psychologist involved (in the case of disciplinary council) and imagine what other behaviour would have been appropriate in the situation and justify this choice. Students will be asked to identify the authors and to respect APA standards. The work should not exceed 1 page (excluding the cover page and bibliography). |
Organisational arrangements for the end of Q1 2020-2021 assessments (Covid-19) online or face-to-face (according to assessment schedule)
- Production of individual or group work, essay, report, dissertation...
Description of the modifications to the Q1 2020-2021 online assessment procedures (Covid-19) online or face-to-face (according to assessment schedule)
Students will be invited to complete a group work (group of 2 to 3 students). To do so, they will have to select a case resulting from a request for an opinion from the commission or relating to a decision of the disciplinary council, among the proposed situations.
They will then have to analyze it with regard to the Code of Ethics/deontology, lectures, recommended readings, thematic files of the Commission of Psychologists and personal scientific readings. In concrete terms, students will have to
- Indicate to which ethical/deontology aspect(s) the situation refers and justify their choices.
- Identify a possible fault, infringement or breach of the code of ethics/deontology (or not) and justify their position
- Put oneself in the position of the applicant (in the case of a request for advice) or the psychologist involved (in the case of disciplinary council) and imagine what other behaviour would have been appropriate in the situation and justify this choice.
Students will be asked to identify the authors and to respect APA standards. The work should not exceed 1 page (excluding the cover page and bibliography).
Content of Learning Activity
Professional secret, failure to assist a person in danger, management of psychological records, management of the lockdown
Case studies
Required Learning Resources/Tools
Book chapters, online papers from the Commission of psychologists, and slides on Moodle
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
Not applicable
Other Recommended Reading
Not applicable
Mode of delivery
- Mixed
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
- Séminaires
Evaluations
The assessment methods of the Learning Activity (AA) are specified in the course description of the corresponding Educational Component (UE)