![]() | Study programme 2024-2025 | Français | |
![]() | Architectures - Territories - Strategies - Landscape | ||
Programme component of Master's in Architecture (MONS) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning |
Code | Type | Head of UE | Department’s contact details | Teacher(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
UA-M1-ARCHIT-002-M | Optional UE | HOLOFFE Etienne | A520 - Service des Projets, Ville et Territoire |
|
Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Credits | Weighting | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | 0 | 312 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 24.00 | Année |
AA Code | Teaching Activity (AA) | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term | Weighting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Architecture Project - ATSL IV-I | 0 | 156 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Q1 | 50.00% |
A-PRVT-634 | Architecture Project - ATPL IV-II | 0 | 156 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 50.00% |
Programme component |
---|
Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes of UE
KNOWLEDGES
At the end of the workshop ATSP, the students will be capable: -To determine appreciably a territory. -To take a stand by diagnosis. -To develop a strategy according to a scenario. -To propose attitudes of structuring and preparation of the territory which guarantee an environmental quality. The concept of the project thus lies in the approach of a right scale to program contemporary challenges linking to equal part landscaping and architectural concerns.
UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance
Workshop philosophy
ATSP advances URBANISM AND ARCHITECTURE as the areas specific to the CULTURES OF SPACE.
A quasi-geographical TERRITORIAL APPROACH USES THE PROJECT AS A PROCESS OF SENSITIVE QUALIFICATION OF BUILT AND NON-BUILT LEGACIES.
An inductive methodology, concerned with an economy of means, causes the diagnosis before formally producing PLANOLOGICAL WRITING.
ON THE SCALE - TERRITORY …
No projection on the territory can today be reduced to a personal stylistic vision.
In this sense, the architect does not impose but sensitizes, reveals or even provokes cultural situations.
Starting from an almost GEOGRAPHICAL vision at the REGIONAL and/or INTERREGIONAL level, ATSP therefore focuses mainly on the SENSITIVE QUALIFICATION and the valorisation of territories of low densities in search or in loss of meaning: INDUSTRIAL WASTELAND, SETS OF YEARS 60-70, NATURAL PARKS, RIVERS, SLOW ROADS, AGRO-URBAN AREAS...
The strategic partnerships SUPRA communaux, the projects of VILLE and the PCDR serve regularly as first observatories. Analytical grids are then applied to them in search of the figures and components of the territories of tomorrow, as envisaged in particular by the approach of STUDIO SECCHI-VIGANO.
It is therefore a question of planning the space but by first proposing attitudes of structuring and PREPARATION OF THE TERRITORY that guarantee an environmental and LANDSCAPE quality of the unfurnished space, to then be able to program answers to our NEEDS and public equipment in a certain ECONOMY OF MEANS.
An INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY is installed in which the project is conducted as a process whose successive phases ANALYSIS - DIAGNOSIS -SCENARIO- naturally challenge sources of knowledge to formally lead to a PROJECT WRITING or architectural and landscape intentions will be intimately linked.
…TO THE PROJECT SITUATION.
How to keep the awakening of a transversal discipline ?
It is to this type of questioning that ATSP and the pedagogy it proposes : a prospective approach based on the transversal diagnosis that defines the cultural, defends HYPER CONTEXTUALIZATION and regularly confronts the architectural form with the culture of the landscape.
Thus, at the meeting of the daily existence of INHERITANCES of all kinds and of GEOGRAPHY as a revelator of human relationships with places, the student grasps a theme, constructs a scenario and induces a program, a PLANOLOGY, or, if you will, project conditions. In this sense, the architect does not improvise but sensitizes, reveals and then provokes situations.
THE PROCESS BECOMES PROJECT. THE CONCEPT IS NO LONGER THE ENEMY OF THE CONTEXT.
The pretension of singular objects is erased in favour of a recognized rightness in the ability to generate link and sharing.
There is certainly uncertainty, as in real life, but there is above all a will to build a CRITICAL MIND in front of contradictions that our society can sometimes produce.
Through this approach, ATSP seeks the learning of an ARCHITECT who has become not a paper reactionary, no longer a simple performer, but a SEEKER OF POSSIBILITIES.
Prior Experience
To be successful in BA3-A-CARC-003.
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
AA | Type of Teaching Activity/Activities |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 |
|
A-PRVT-634 |
|
Mode of delivery
AA | Mode of delivery |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 |
|
A-PRVT-634 |
|
Required Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Required Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Not applicable |
A-PRVT-634 | Not applicable |
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Recommended Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Not applicable |
A-PRVT-634 | Not applicable |
Other Recommended Reading
AA | Other Recommended Reading |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Not applicable |
A-PRVT-634 | Not applicable |
Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
AA | Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Unauthorized |
A-PRVT-634 | Unauthorized |
Term 1 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 assessment |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 |
|
A-PRVT-634 |
Term 1 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 1 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | The Q1 four-monthly period is worth 1000 points and is enclosed by a final posting quoted in front of jury. Final posting is worth 600/1000 points. The intermediate handing-over in the course of Q1 are worth 400/1000 points.Q1 is considered as successfull with a average of 10/20 or more. |
A-PRVT-634 |
Resit Assessment - Term 1 (B1BA1) - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 resit assessment (BAB1) |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 |
|
A-PRVT-634 |
Term 2 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | |
A-PRVT-634 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 2 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | |
A-PRVT-634 | The Q2 four-monthly is worth 1000 points and is enclosed by a final posting quoted in front of jury.Final posting is worth 600/1000 points.The intermediate handing-over in the course of Q2 are worth 400/1000 points. Q2 is considered as successfull with an average of 10/20 or more. |
Term 3 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 |
|
A-PRVT-634 |
|
Term 3 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 3 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | Not applicable |
A-PRVT-634 | Not applicable |
Q3 UE Assessment
No assessment is planned in Q3 for this UE
Q3 AA Assessment
AA | Q3 AA Assessment |
---|---|
A-PRVT-614 | No assessment is planned in Q3 for this AA |
A-PRVT-634 | No assessment is planned in Q3 for this AA |