Study programme 2022-2023 | Français | ||
Master Thesis | |||
Programme component of Master's in Computer Engineering and Management (MONS) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Engineering |
Code | Type | Head of UE | Department’s contact details | Teacher(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
UI-M2-IRIGIG-001-M | Compulsory UE | PRESIDENT Ex officio | SSERV - Aucun service |
|
Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Credits | Weighting | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20.00 | Full academic year |
AA Code | Teaching Activity (AA) | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term | Weighting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Master Thesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | 100.00% |
Programme component |
---|
Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes of UE
carry out and justify a state of the art based on a relevant bibliographical summary and distinguishing the original contribution of the research; demonstrate autonomy and initiative in carrying out their research in engineering; apprehend with scientific rigor and critical thinking the validity and applicability of results produced as well as methods used; communicate, in writing and orally, in a scientific context. This research-based training is one of the specificities of the civil engineer's education.
UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance
Research; development; state of the art; exploratory study; theoretical and/or experimental study; scientific method; intellectual creation; innovation; modeling and/or implementation; calculation methods; comparison of methods and/or tools; oral and written communication; scientific argumentation; validation; scientific publication.
Prior Experience
Not applicable
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
AA | Type of Teaching Activity/Activities |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Mode of delivery
AA | Mode of delivery |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Required Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Required Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Not applicable |
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Recommended Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Not applicable |
Other Recommended Reading
AA | Other Recommended Reading |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Not applicable |
Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
AA | Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Authorized |
Term 1 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 assessment |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Term 1 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 1 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Not applicable |
Resit Assessment - Term 1 (B1BA1) - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 resit assessment (BAB1) |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 2 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Skills listed under the " Competencies " heading are assessed by the academic supervisor, one (or more) rapporteur appointed by the corresponding Programme Committee and an academic jury. Assessment is based on the 4 following criteria: 1. Quality of the daily work performed 2. Written report (50 pages + annex) 3. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of the Faculty examination board (private examination) 4. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of an examination board including professionals and at least one member of the Faculty (public exam) A qualitative evaluation (from A to F) for each criterion is carried out according to the following scale: A - Excellent: outstanding work with very few minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in most of the tasks. B - Very good: above-average work, despite a limited number of minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in several tasks. C - Good: globally good work, despite some errors. The student properly met the expectations in most of the tasks. D - Satisfactory: decent work but with significant errors or deficiencies. The student met the expectations in several tasks. E - Sufficient: work meeting the minimum requirements; necessary corrections do not imply a complete review of the work. The student met the minimum expectations but no more. F - Fail: poor work with critical errors or failings requiring significant additional work or review. The student did not meet the minimum expectations in most of the tasks. If a criterion has an F score, the overall score can be F. Deliverables specifications and expectations are described by the corresponding Programme Committee. |
Term 3 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 |
|
Term 3 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 3 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
I-GRIG-053 | Skills listed under the " Competencies " heading are assessed by the academic supervisor, one (or more) rapporteur appointed by the corresponding Programme Committee and an academic jury. Assessment is based on the 4 following criteria: 1. Quality of the daily work performed 2. Written report (50 pages + annex) 3. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of the Faculty examination board (private examination) 4. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of an examination board including professionals and at least one member of the Faculty (public exam) A qualitative evaluation (from A to F) for each criterion is carried out according to the following scale: A - Excellent: outstanding work with very few minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in most of the tasks. B - Very good: above-average work, despite a limited number of minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in several tasks. C - Good: globally good work, despite some errors. The student properly met the expectations in most of the tasks. D - Satisfactory: decent work but with significant errors or deficiencies. The student met the expectations in several tasks. E - Sufficient: work meeting the minimum requirements; necessary corrections do not imply a complete review of the work. The student met the minimum expectations but no more. F - Fail: poor work with critical errors or failings requiring significant additional work or review. The student did not meet the minimum expectations in most of the tasks. If a criterion has an F score, the overall score can be F. Deliverables specifications and expectations are described by the corresponding Programme Committee. |