Study programme 2022-2023Français
Master Thesis
Programme component of Master's in Computer Engineering and Management (MONS) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Engineering

CodeTypeHead of UE Department’s
contact details
Teacher(s)
UI-M2-IRIGIG-001-MCompulsory UEPRESIDENT Ex officioSSERV - Aucun service
  • PRESIDENT Ex officio

Language
of instruction
Language
of assessment
HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) CreditsWeighting Term
  • Français
Français000002020.00Full academic year

AA CodeTeaching Activity (AA) HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) Term Weighting
I-GRIG-053Master Thesis00000A100.00%

Programme component

Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes

  • Imagine, design, develop, and implement conceptual models and computer solutions to address complex problems including decision-making, optimisation, management and production as part of a business innovation approach by integrating changing needs, contexts and issues (technical, economic, societal, ethical and environmental).
    • Identify complex problems to be solved and develop the specifications with the client by integrating needs, contexts and issues (technical, economic, societal, ethical and environmental).
    • On the basis of modelling, design a system or a strategy addressing the problem raised; evaluate them in light of various parameters of the specifications.
    • Deliver a solution selected in the form of diagrams, graphs, prototypes, software and/or digital models.
    • Evaluate the approach and results for their adaptation (modularity, optimisation, quality, robustness, reliability, upgradeability, etc.).
    • Integrate technological innovation and intelligence within engineering teams.
  • Mobilise a structured set of scientific knowledge and skills and specialised techniques in order to carry out computer and management engineering missions, using their expertise and adaptability.
    • Master and appropriately mobilise knowledge, models, methods and techniques specific to computer management engineering.
    • Analyse and model an innovative IT solution or a business strategy by critically selecting theories and methodological approaches (modelling, optimisation, algorithms, calculations), and taking into account multidisciplinary aspects.
    • Identify and discuss possible applications of new and emerging technologies in the field of information technology and sciences and quantifying and qualifying business management.
    • Assess the validity of models and results in view of the state of science and characteristics of the problem.
  • Plan, manage and lead projects in view of their objectives, resources and constraints, ensuring the quality of activities and deliverables.
    • Define and align the project in view of its objectives, resources and constraints.
    • Exploit project management principles and tools, particularly the work plan, schedule, document monitoring, versioning and software development methodologies.
    • Assess the approach and achievements, regulate them in view of the observations and feedback received.
    • Respect deadlines and timescales
  • Communicate and exchange information in a structured way - orally, graphically and in writing, in French and in one or more other languages - scientifically, culturally, technically and interpersonally, by adapting to the intended purpose and the relevant public.
    • Argue to and persuade customers, teachers and boards, both orally and in writing.
    • Select and use the written and oral communication methods and materials adapted to the intended purpose and the relevant public.
    • Use and produce scientific and technical documents (reports, plans, specifications) adapted to the intended purpose and the relevant public.
  • Adopt a professional and responsible approach, showing an open and critical mind in an independent professional development process.
    • Show an open and critical mind by bringing to light technical and non-technical issues of analysed problems and proposed solutions.
    • Exploit the different means available in order to inform and train independently.
  • Contribute by researching the innovative solution of a problem in engineering sciences.
    • Construct a theoretical or conceptual reference framework, formulate innovative solutions from the analysis of scientific literature, particularly in new or emerging disciplines.
    • Develop and implement conceptual analysis, numerical modelling, software implementations, experimental studies and behavioural analysis.
    • Collect and analyse data rigorously.
    • Adequately interpret results taking into account the reference framework within which the research was developed.

Learning Outcomes of UE

carry out and justify a state of the art based on a relevant bibliographical summary and distinguishing the original contribution of the research; demonstrate autonomy and initiative in carrying out their research in engineering; apprehend with scientific rigor and critical thinking the validity and applicability of results produced as well as methods used; communicate, in writing and orally, in a scientific context. This research-based training is one of the specificities of the civil engineer's education.

UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance

Research; development; state of the art; exploratory study; theoretical and/or experimental study; scientific method; intellectual creation; innovation; modeling and/or implementation; calculation methods; comparison of methods and/or tools; oral and written communication; scientific argumentation; validation; scientific publication.

Prior Experience

Not applicable

Type of Teaching Activity/Activities

AAType of Teaching Activity/Activities
I-GRIG-053
  • Travaux de fin d'études et mémoires

Mode of delivery

AAMode of delivery
I-GRIG-053
  • Hybrid

Required Learning Resources/Tools

AARequired Learning Resources/Tools
I-GRIG-053Not applicable

Recommended Learning Resources/Tools

AARecommended Learning Resources/Tools
I-GRIG-053Not applicable

Other Recommended Reading

AAOther Recommended Reading
I-GRIG-053Not applicable

Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next

AAGrade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
I-GRIG-053Authorized

Term 1 Assessment - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q1 assessment
I-GRIG-053
  • N/A - N/A

Term 1 Assessment - comments

AATerm 1 Assessment - comments
I-GRIG-053Not applicable

Resit Assessment - Term 1 (B1BA1) - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q1 resit assessment (BAB1)
I-GRIG-053
  • N/A - Néant

Term 2 Assessment - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment
I-GRIG-053
  • Production (written work, report, essay, collection, product, etc.) - To be submitted in class
  • Oral presentation - Face-to-face

Term 2 Assessment - comments

AATerm 2 Assessment - comments
I-GRIG-053Skills listed under the " Competencies " heading are assessed by the academic supervisor, one (or more) rapporteur appointed by the corresponding Programme Committee and an academic jury. Assessment is based on the 4 following criteria: 1. Quality of the daily work performed 2. Written report (50 pages + annex) 3. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of the Faculty examination board (private examination) 4. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of an examination board including professionals and at least one member of the Faculty (public exam) A qualitative evaluation (from A to F) for each criterion is carried out according to the following scale: A - Excellent: outstanding work with very few minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in most of the tasks. B - Very good: above-average work, despite a limited number of minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in several tasks. C - Good: globally good work, despite some errors. The student properly met the expectations in most of the tasks. D - Satisfactory: decent work but with significant errors or deficiencies. The student met the expectations in several tasks. E - Sufficient: work meeting the minimum requirements; necessary corrections do not imply a complete review of the work. The student met the minimum expectations but no more. F - Fail: poor work with critical errors or failings requiring significant additional work or review. The student did not meet the minimum expectations in most of the tasks. If a criterion has an F score, the overall score can be F. Deliverables specifications and expectations are described by the corresponding Programme Committee.

Term 3 Assessment - type

AAType(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment
I-GRIG-053
  • Production (written work, report, essay, collection, product, etc.) - To be submitted in class
  • Oral presentation - Face-to-face

Term 3 Assessment - comments

AATerm 3 Assessment - comments
I-GRIG-053Skills listed under the " Competencies " heading are assessed by the academic supervisor, one (or more) rapporteur appointed by the corresponding Programme Committee and an academic jury. Assessment is based on the 4 following criteria: 1. Quality of the daily work performed 2. Written report (50 pages + annex) 3. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of the Faculty examination board (private examination) 4. Oral exam (20 min plus discussion) in front of an examination board including professionals and at least one member of the Faculty (public exam) A qualitative evaluation (from A to F) for each criterion is carried out according to the following scale: A - Excellent: outstanding work with very few minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in most of the tasks. B - Very good: above-average work, despite a limited number of minor errors. The student exceeded the expectations in several tasks. C - Good: globally good work, despite some errors. The student properly met the expectations in most of the tasks. D - Satisfactory: decent work but with significant errors or deficiencies. The student met the expectations in several tasks. E - Sufficient: work meeting the minimum requirements; necessary corrections do not imply a complete review of the work. The student met the minimum expectations but no more. F - Fail: poor work with critical errors or failings requiring significant additional work or review. The student did not meet the minimum expectations in most of the tasks. If a criterion has an F score, the overall score can be F. Deliverables specifications and expectations are described by the corresponding Programme Committee.
(*) HT : Hours of theory - HTPE : Hours of in-class exercices - HTPS : hours of practical work - HD : HMiscellaneous time - HR : Hours of remedial classes. - Per. (Period), Y=Year, Q1=1st term et Q2=2nd term
Date de dernière mise à jour de la fiche ECTS par l'enseignant : 22/06/2022
Date de dernière génération automatique de la page : 20/06/2023
20, place du Parc, B7000 Mons - Belgique
Tél: +32 (0)65 373111
Courriel: info.mons@umons.ac.be